United States v. Vincent Jones

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Vincent Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 861 F.3d 638
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided June 30, 2017·No. 16-4254·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

June 30, 2017

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

No. 16-4254

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States Plaintiff-Appellee, District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division.

v.

No. 3:15-cr-00048-JD-MGG-1 VINCENT JONES, Defendant-Appellant. Jon E. DeGuilio, Judge.

ORDER

The opinion issued on June 28, 2017, in connection with the above-referenced case, is AMENDED as follows:

Page 6, first paragraph under the heading Discussion, line 5: the word “in” should be inserted after the word “wrong.”

Page 10, footnote 1, is completely replaced with the following language: “For purposes of argument, we will assume that the gun safes were closed, and thus the officers could not have observed the guns in plain view.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Vincent Jones, (7th Cir. 2017).

United States v. Vincent Jones (United States v. Vincent Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.