United States v. Vincent
This text of United States v. Vincent (United States v. Vincent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-30600 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SHAUN VINCENT,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 01-CR-358-F -------------------- January 17, 2003
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Shaun Vincent (“Vincent”) appeals his conviction of being a
felon in possession of a firearm under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).
Vincent argues that the district court erred in allowing the
Government to use two prior misdemeanor convictions to impeach
him under FED. R. EVID. 609. Any error was harmless because the
district court gave cautionary instructions during cross-
examination and immediately prior to deliberations and because
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-30600 -2-
the convictions were cumulative. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 52(a);
United States v. Newman, 849 F.2d 156, 163 (5th Cir. 1988).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Vincent, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-vincent-ca5-2003.