United States v. Villegas-Tirado
This text of 332 F. App'x 416 (United States v. Villegas-Tirado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Angel Villegas-Tirado appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm, but remand to correct the judgment.
Villegas-Tirado contends that the sentence is unreasonable in light of his motivation for re-entering and the need to avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities. The record reflects that the district court properly considered the § 3553(a) factors, and that, in light of the totality of the circumstances, the sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Crowe, 563 F.3d 969, 978 (9th Cir.2009); see also United States v. Autery, 555 F.3d 864, 873-78 (9th Cir.2009).
We remand the case to the district court with instructions that it delete from the judgment the incorrect reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). See United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir.2000); see also United States v. Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir.2000) (remanding sua sponte to delete the reference to § 1326(b)(2)).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct the judgment.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
332 F. App'x 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-villegas-tirado-ca9-2009.