United States v. Villanueva
This text of 171 F. App'x 633 (United States v. Villanueva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Antonio Villanueva appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed after his guilty plea to illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
The record reflects that the district court would have imposed the same sentence had it been aware that the Sentencing Guidelines were advisory. See United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073,1083 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 F. App'x 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-villanueva-ca9-2006.