United States v. Viken Hovsepian Viken Yacoubian, Viken Hovsepian v. United States of America United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Viken Hovsepian, Viken Yacoubian v. United States of America United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

326 F.3d 1041, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 3834, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 6523
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 7, 2003
Docket99-50041
StatusPublished

This text of 326 F.3d 1041 (United States v. Viken Hovsepian Viken Yacoubian, Viken Hovsepian v. United States of America United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Viken Hovsepian, Viken Yacoubian v. United States of America United States Immigration and Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Viken Hovsepian Viken Yacoubian, Viken Hovsepian v. United States of America United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Viken Hovsepian, Viken Yacoubian v. United States of America United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, 326 F.3d 1041, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 3834, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 6523 (9th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

326 F.3d 1041

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Viken Hovsepian; Viken Yacoubian, Defendants-Appellees.
Viken Hovsepian, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
United States of America; United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Defendants-Appellants.
Viken Hovsepian, Viken Yacoubian, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
United States of America; United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 99-50041.

No. 99-56922.

No. 00-55320.

No. 01-55247.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 7, 2003.

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Notes:

1

Judge Trott was recused

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Hovsepian
326 F.3d 1041 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
326 F.3d 1041, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 3834, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 6523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-viken-hovsepian-viken-yacoubian-viken-hovsepian-v-united-ca9-2003.