United States v. Vig
This text of United States v. Vig (United States v. Vig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before GASTON, ATTANASIO, and HOUTZ Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
Jordan L. VIG Master-at-Arms Seaman (E-3), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 202000079
Decided: 22 October 2020
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Michael J. Luken
Sentence adjudged 30 January 2020 by a special court-martial con- vened at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for 170 days, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Scott Stoebner, JAGC, USN
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a). United States v. Vig, NMCCA No. 202000079 Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Vig, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-vig-nmcca-2020.