United States v. Victor Stitt, II

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Victor Stitt, II. Read the opinion of the Court — 637 F. App'x 927
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 27, 2016·No. 14-6158·Unpublished

Opinion

No. 14-6158

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

FILED

Apr 27, 2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk )

Plaintiff-Appellee, ) )

v. ) ) ORDER

VICTOR J. STITT, II, ) )

Defendant-Appellant. ) ) ) )

BEFORE: COLE, Chief Judge; BOGGS, BATCHELDER, MOORE, CLAY, GIBBONS, ROGERS, SUTTON, COOK McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing

of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

“The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.”

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is

vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Victor Stitt, II, (6th Cir. 2016).

United States v. Victor Stitt, II (United States v. Victor Stitt, II) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.