United States v. Victor Mendoza-Toledo

610 F. App'x 418
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 22, 2015
Docket14-40325
StatusUnpublished

This text of 610 F. App'x 418 (United States v. Victor Mendoza-Toledo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Victor Mendoza-Toledo, 610 F. App'x 418 (5th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Victor Manuel Mendoza-Toledo (Mendoza) appeals his 30-month sentence for illegal reentry on the ground that the district court erred by imposing an enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i). As Mendoza objected in the district court on this basis, we review the imposition of the enhancement de novo. See United States v. Morales-Martinez, 496 F.3d 356, 357 (5th Cir.2007). We have rejected Mendoza’s reading of Moncrieffe v. Holder, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1678, 185 L.Ed.2d 727 (2013), and his argument that a state drug conviction need involve financial remuneration to constitute a drug trafficking offense for purposes of § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i). See United States v. Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d 198, 201-05 (5th Cir.2015) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Morales-Martinez
496 F.3d 356 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
Moncrieffe v. Holder
133 S. Ct. 1678 (Supreme Court, 2013)
United States v. Juan Martinez-Lugo
782 F.3d 198 (Fifth Circuit, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
610 F. App'x 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-victor-mendoza-toledo-ca5-2015.