United States v. Victor Luis Ziller

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Victor Luis Ziller

623 F.2d 562, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 19791

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 10, 1980

Docket79-1395

StatusPublished

Cited by19 cases

This text of 623 F.2d 562 (United States v. Victor Luis Ziller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Victor Luis Ziller, 623 F.2d 562, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 19791 (9th Cir. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant Ziller was convicted in the district court of importation of and conspiracy to import cocaine. He appeals. We affirm.

On this appeal, Ziller challenges the introduction into evidence of a piece of paper which he contends was illegally seized from his wallet without a warrant.

Ziller was arrested outside the San Francisco airport and transported directly to the federal building, at which time agents searched Zilier’s person. During the search, Ziller’s wallet was taken from his person, opened and a slip of paper containing damaging evidence was removed therefrom. Appellant challenges neither the legality of the arrest nor the search of his person, but does challenge the warrantless search of his wallet.

We have on previous occasions in this circuit upheld warrantless wallet searches. See, e. g., United States v. Gallop, 606 F.2d 836 (9th Cir. 1979). Other circuits have held similarly, United States v. Sheehan, 583 F.2d 30 (1st Cir. 1978); United States v. Swofford, 529 F.2d 119 (8th Cir. 1976); *563 United States v. Simpson, 453 F.2d 1028 (10th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 408 U.S. 925, 92 S.Ct. 2504, 33 L.Ed.2d 337 (1972); United States v. Castro, 596 F.2d 674 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963, 100 S.Ct. 448, 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).

Appellant contends that these cases are not longer applicable in the light of United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1, 97 S.Ct. 2476, 53 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977). In Chadwick the Supreme Court held invalid a warrant-less search of a locked footlocker lawfully seized as incident to defendant’s arrest but which was not immediately associated with him. But the Court expressly excluded from the Chadwick holding “searches of the person” of the accused, as in United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218, 94 S.Ct. 467, 38 L.Ed.2d 427 (1973) and United States v. Edwards, 415 U.S. 800, 94 S.Ct. 1234, 39 L.Ed.2d 771 (1974). 433 U.S. at 16 n.10, 97 S.Ct. at 2486 n.10. In our view, a search of the person which produced the wallet being permissible under Chadwick, a search of the contents of the wallet is likewise permissible as being an incident to and a part of a personal search.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant Ziller was convicted in the district court of importation of and conspiracy to import cocaine. He appeals. We affirm.

On this appeal, Ziller challenges the introduction into evidence of a piece of paper which he contends was illegally seized from his wallet without a warrant.

Ziller was arrested outside the San Francisco airport and transported directly to the federal building, at which time agents searched Zilier’s person. During the search, Ziller’s wallet was taken from his person, opened and a slip of paper containing damaging evidence was removed therefrom. Appellant challenges neither the legality of the arrest nor the search of his person, but does challenge the warrantless search of his wallet.

We have on previous occasions in this circuit upheld warrantless wallet searches. See, e. g., United States v. Gallop, 606 F.2d 836 (9th Cir. 1979). Other circuits have held similarly, United States v. Sheehan, 583 F.2d 30 (1st Cir. 1978); United States v. Swofford, 529 F.2d 119 (8th Cir. 1976); *563 United States v. Simpson, 453 F.2d 1028 (10th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 408 U.S. 925, 92 S.Ct. 2504, 33 L.Ed.2d 337 (1972); United States v. Castro, 596 F.2d 674 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963, 100 S.Ct. 448, 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).

Appellant contends that these cases are not longer applicable in the light of United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1, 97 S.Ct. 2476, 53 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977). In Chadwick the Supreme Court held invalid a warrant-less search of a locked footlocker lawfully seized as incident to defendant’s arrest but which was not immediately associated with him. But the Court expressly excluded from the Chadwick holding “searches of the person” of the accused, as in United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218, 94 S.Ct. 467, 38 L.Ed.2d 427 (1973) and United States v. Edwards, 415 U.S. 800, 94 S.Ct. 1234, 39 L.Ed.2d 771 (1974). 433 U.S. at 16 n.10, 97 S.Ct. at 2486 n.10. In our view, a search of the person which produced the wallet being permissible under Chadwick, a search of the contents of the wallet is likewise permissible as being an incident to and a part of a personal search.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

623 F.2d 562, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 19791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-victor-luis-ziller-ca9-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack