United States v. Victor John Gomez

378 F.2d 938, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6179
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided May 31, 1967·No. 9125·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee-plaintiff recovered a $15,000 judgment against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U. S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671 et seq. The award was for injuries sustained in the operation of a power saw while he was engaged in work on a prison construction crew as a federal prisoner in a federal correctional institution. The trial court concluded that such recovery was proper under United States v. Muniz, 374 U. S. 150, 83 S.Ct. 1850, 10 L.Ed.2d 805. *939 After the judgment was entered, the Supreme Court of the United States held in United States v. Demko, 385 U.S. 149, 87 S.Ct. 382, 17 L.Ed.2d 258, that the compensation benefits provided by 18 U.S.C. § 4126 constitute the exclusive remedy for injuries received by federal prisoners while performing assigned prison tasks. That decision precludes recovery under the Federal Tort Claims Act in the instant case.

The judgment is reversed and the case remanded with directions to dismiss the action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Victor John Gomez, 378 F.2d 938, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6179 (10th Cir. 1967).

378 F.2d 938 (United States v. Victor John Gomez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. United States
561 F.3d 1090 (Tenth Circuit, 2009)
Alvarez v. Ashcroft
155 F. App'x 393 (Tenth Circuit, 2005)
Pickens v. FBP
113 F.3d 1246 (Tenth Circuit, 1997)
Archie Wilson, Jr. v. United States
433 F.2d 597 (Tenth Circuit, 1970)