United States v. Victor Battista, Ralph C. Hobbs, George Laris, Gaetano Alexander Miceli, Joseph B. Morris, George Laris

397 F.2d 286
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedNovember 12, 1968
Docket16880
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 397 F.2d 286 (United States v. Victor Battista, Ralph C. Hobbs, George Laris, Gaetano Alexander Miceli, Joseph B. Morris, George Laris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Victor Battista, Ralph C. Hobbs, George Laris, Gaetano Alexander Miceli, Joseph B. Morris, George Laris, 397 F.2d 286 (3d Cir. 1968).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Before HASTIE, Chief Judge, and STALEY and SEITZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying the motion of George Laris, defendant-appellant, for a new trial. Laris was convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 2314, for knowingly transporting in interstate commerce stolen S & H Green Stamps of a value in excess of $5,000. Upon this appeal, Laris contends, inter alia, that he was denied the right of choice of counsel, that the arrest and search were illegal, and that the district court erred in refusing to postpone his trial because of his alleged ill health.

We have carefully considered all of defendant’s contentions and we have independently examined the entire record. We can find no error.

Accordingly, the order of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
397 F.2d 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-victor-battista-ralph-c-hobbs-george-laris-gaetano-ca3-1968.