United States v. Vicki Solomon Dickerson

43 F.3d 1468, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40086, 1994 WL 702621
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 16, 1994
Docket94-6744
StatusUnpublished

This text of 43 F.3d 1468 (United States v. Vicki Solomon Dickerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Vicki Solomon Dickerson, 43 F.3d 1468, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40086, 1994 WL 702621 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

43 F.3d 1468

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Vicki Solomon DICKERSON, Defendant Appellant.

No. 94-6744.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 17, 1994
Decided: December 16, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-437-A, CA-93-976-AM)

Vicki Solomon Dickerson, Appellant Pro Se. William Neil Hammerstrom, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying her 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Dickerson, Nos. CR-90-437-A; CA-93-976-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 13, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 F.3d 1468, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40086, 1994 WL 702621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-vicki-solomon-dickerson-ca4-1994.