United States v. Vicki Enterprises, Inc.

496 F.2d 1403, 61 C.C.P.A. 75
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals·Decided June 13, 1974·No. CA 5516; C.A.D. 1125·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

BaldwiN, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision and judgment of the Second Division of the Customs Court, Appellate Term which appears at 68 Cust. Ct. 324, A.R.D. 302, 343 F. Supp. 1381 (1972) and affirms ■the judgment of a single judge sitting in reappraisement, 67 Cust. Ct. 480, R.D. 11750 (1971). The imported merchandise is field glasses.

Both courts below sustained the importer’s appeal and held that •the 26 consolidated appeals for reappraisement involved separable appraisements and that the disputed inland charges and buying commission charges were non-dutiable.

After a thorough consideration of appellant’s arguments, we have concluded that we are in full agreement with the opinion of the Appellate Term, and we adopt it as our own. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Vicki Enterprises, Inc., 496 F.2d 1403, 61 C.C.P.A. 75 (ccpa 1974).

496 F.2d 1403 (United States v. Vicki Enterprises, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LMI-La Metalli Industriale v. United States
912 F.2d 455 (Federal Circuit, 1990)
Lmi--La Metalli Industriale, S.P.A. v. United States
912 F.2d 455 (Federal Circuit, 1990)
J. C. Penney Purchasing Corp. v. United States
451 F. Supp. 973 (U.S. Customs Court, 1978)
United States v. Imperial Products, Inc.
570 F.2d 337 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1978)