United States v. Verrusio

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided June 19, 2017·No. Criminal No. 2009-0064·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Criminal Case No. 09-cr-00064 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell FRASER VERRUSIO,

Defendant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s

Memorandum Opinion on the defendant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, and Correct Sentence

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, or in the Alternative, Petition for a Writ of Error Coram Nobis,

ECF No. 180, the related legal memoranda in support and in opposition, and the entire record

herein, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Date: June 19, 2017

This is a final and appealable Order.

__________________________ BERYL A. HOWELL Chief Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Verrusio, (D.D.C. 2017).

United States v. Verrusio (United States v. Verrusio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related