United States v. Vera

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Vera. Read the opinion of the Court — 82 F. App'x 931
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 9, 2003·No. 96-10329·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10329 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ERNEST VERA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CR-94-A-1 - - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1997 Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Ernest Vera has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th

Cir. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Vera, (5th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Vera (United States v. Vera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)