United States v. Veney

667 F. App'x 66
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 29, 2016·No. No. 16-6468·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding ' precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lemoyne Veney seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying several motions Veney filed in his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) proceeding. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Veney seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Veney, 667 F. App'x 66 (4th Cir. 2016).

667 F. App'x 66 (United States v. Veney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)