United States v. Velasquez-Trujillo
This text of 95 F. App'x 244 (United States v. Velasquez-Trujillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jose Velasquez-Trujillo appeals his 57-month sentence following a guilty-plea conviction for being an alien found in the United States after deportation and without permission, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a), and we affirm.
[245]*245Velasquez-Trujillo contends that the district court failed to properly consider facts that would have warranted a downward departure. The district court specifically found that Velasquez-Trujillo’s case was not outside the heartland for either of the purposes he suggested, and declined to depart. We will not review the district court’s discretionary refusal to depart downward from the Guidelines where, as here, the district court recognized it had authority to depart and declined. See United States v. Lipman, 133 F.3d 726, 732 (9th Cir.1998).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 F. App'x 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-velasquez-trujillo-ca9-2004.