United States v. Velasquez-Perez

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Velasquez-Perez

436 F. App'x 934

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedAugust 4, 2011

DocketNo. 10-14505

StatusPublished

This text of 436 F. App'x 934 (United States v. Velasquez-Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Velasquez-Perez, 436 F. App'x 934 (11th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Maria Guzman, appointed counsel for Isac Velasquez-Perez, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Velasquez-Perez’s conviction and within-guideline sentence is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Maria Guzman, appointed counsel for Isac Velasquez-Perez, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Velasquez-Perez’s conviction and within-guideline sentence is AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

436 F. App'x 934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-velasquez-perez-ca11-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack