United States v. Vazquez-Pacheco
This text of 622 F. App'x 596 (United States v. Vazquez-Pacheco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jose Vazquez-Pacheco directly appeals after he pled guilty to illegally reentering the United States, and the district court1 sentenced him within his calculated Guidelines range to 16 months in prison. His counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the district court imposed a substantively unreasonable sentence. Counsel has also moved to withdraw.
Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster, 672 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir.2009) (en banc); see also Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). In addition, having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
622 F. App'x 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-vazquez-pacheco-ca8-2015.