United States v. Vazquez-Pacheco

622 F. App'x 596
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedNovember 17, 2015
DocketNo. 15-2683
StatusPublished

This text of 622 F. App'x 596 (United States v. Vazquez-Pacheco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Vazquez-Pacheco, 622 F. App'x 596 (8th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jose Vazquez-Pacheco directly appeals after he pled guilty to illegally reentering the United States, and the district court1 sentenced him within his calculated Guidelines range to 16 months in prison. His counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the district court imposed a substantively unreasonable sentence. Counsel has also moved to withdraw.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster, 672 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir.2009) (en banc); see also Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). In addition, having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Gall v. United States
552 U.S. 38 (Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
622 F. App'x 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-vazquez-pacheco-ca8-2015.