United States v. Vazquez

101 F. App'x 467
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 24, 2004
Docket03-30968
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 101 F. App'x 467 (United States v. Vazquez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Vazquez, 101 F. App'x 467 (5th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Stephen Lee Vazquez appeals the sentence imposed after he pleaded guilty to conspiring to possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine. Relying on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), he contends that his sentence exceeded the maximum sentence provided by the sentencing guidelines for the type of methamphetamine charged in his indictment. As Vazquez concedes, Apprendi does not apply to drug quantities that increase only the statutory minimum sentence or the relevant conduct under the sentencing guidelines. See United States v. Keith, 230 F.3d 784, 787 (5th Cir.2000). Vazquez asserts the claim in order to preserve it for possible Supreme Court review. Vazquez’s claim is foreclosed, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vazquez v. United States
543 U.S. 1107 (Supreme Court, 2005)
Meza v. United States
543 U.S. 1098 (Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 F. App'x 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-vazquez-ca5-2004.