United States v. Vaught

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Vaught

464 F. App'x 139

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 3, 2012·No. No. 11-7419·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Quintín Eugene Vaught appeals the district court’s order denying Vaught’s “Petition for Writ of Mandamus, Compelling Government to Specifically Perform Plea Agreement.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Vaught, No. 4:08-cr-00375-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Oct. 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Quintín Eugene Vaught appeals the district court’s order denying Vaught’s “Petition for Writ of Mandamus, Compelling Government to Specifically Perform Plea Agreement.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Vaught, No. 4:08-cr-00375-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Oct. 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Vaught, 464 F. App'x 139 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

464 F. App'x 139 (United States v. Vaught) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.