United States v. Vasquez-vasquez

376 F. App'x 805

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 20 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 06-10245

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. CR-05-01398-FRZ

v. MEMORANDUM * ANGEL VASQUEZ-VASQUEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Frank R. Zapata, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 5, 2009 **

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Angel Vasquez-Vasquez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 24-

month sentence for conspiracy to transport illegal aliens and transportation of an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). illegal alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Vasquez-Vasquez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are

no grounds for relief, along with a request to withdraw as counsel of record.

By order filed February 1, 2010, counsel was advised that the court appeared

to lack jurisdiction over the appeal because appellant has been released from

custody and his term of supervised release has expired. Counsel was ordered to

move for voluntary dismissal or show cause why the appeal should not be

dismissed. To date, counsel has not responded.

Because Vasquez-Vasquez has been released from custody and his term of

supervised release has expired, we dismiss the appeal as moot. See United States v.

Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is

DISMISSED.

2 06-10245