United States v. Vasquez Molina

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Vasquez Molina. Read the opinion of the Court — 588 F. Supp. 2d 1
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided October 16, 2009·No. Criminal No. 2006-0232·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

§ § UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, § § v. § Crim. No. 06-232-10-RCL § JAIME MEDINA, JORGE EMIGDIO§ F k E VASQUEZ MOLINA, UBERNEL § ' PEREZ QUINTERO § ggr §§ 2003 Defendants. § _ §

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Recently this Court has received letters from defendants Jaime Medina, Jorge Emigdio Vasquez Molina, and Ubernel Perez Quintero asking that they be assigned new counsel. The letters, which are attached to this Memorandum and Order shall be filed in the record of this case.

At a hearing today Mr. Medina and Mr. Vasquez Molina withdrew their requests for new counsel. Mr. Perez Quintero, however, persisted in his request. As a sufficient basis for the appointment of new counsel has not been proffered, it is hereby ORDERED that Mr. Perez Quintero’s request is DENIED.

SO ORDERED this 16th day of October 2009.

@c.a¢~¢l/W'»

RoYCE c. LAMBERTH Chief Judge United States District Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Vasquez Molina, (D.D.C. 2009).

United States v. Vasquez Molina (United States v. Vasquez Molina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.