United States v. Vasquez

131 F. App'x 978
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Vasquez. Read the opinion of the Court — 298 F.3d 354
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 20, 2005·No. 05-50486·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: 1

Gabriel Vasquez appeals from an order of the district court denying his motion to revoke the magistrate judge’s pretrial detention order. Vasquez has filed a motion contained in his brief for permission to supplement the record. This motion is DENIED as unnecessary.

The district court’s decision, which effectively adopted the reasoning of the magistrate judge, rests upon its conclusion that Vasquez has not rebutted the presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of the community and that Vasquez poses a flight risk should he be released on bond. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) & (f). The district court’s conclusions are supported by the record. See United States v. Rueben, 974 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir.1992).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

1

. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Vasquez, 131 F. App'x 978 (5th Cir. 2005).

131 F. App'x 978 (United States v. Vasquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Mauricio Rueben and Gerardo Guerra
974 F.2d 580 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)