United States v. Vasquez

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Vasquez

131 F. App'x 978

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 20, 2005

Docket05-50486

StatusUnpublished

This text of 131 F. App'x 978 (United States v. Vasquez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Vasquez, 131 F. App'x 978 (5th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM: 1

Gabriel Vasquez appeals from an order of the district court denying his motion to revoke the magistrate judge’s pretrial detention order. Vasquez has filed a motion contained in his brief for permission to supplement the record. This motion is DENIED as unnecessary.

The district court’s decision, which effectively adopted the reasoning of the magistrate judge, rests upon its conclusion that Vasquez has not rebutted the presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of the community and that Vasquez poses a flight risk should he be released on bond. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) & (f). The district court’s conclusions are supported by the record. See United States v. Rueben, 974 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir.1992).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

1

. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: 1

Gabriel Vasquez appeals from an order of the district court denying his motion to revoke the magistrate judge’s pretrial detention order. Vasquez has filed a motion contained in his brief for permission to supplement the record. This motion is DENIED as unnecessary.

The district court’s decision, which effectively adopted the reasoning of the magistrate judge, rests upon its conclusion that Vasquez has not rebutted the presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of the community and that Vasquez poses a flight risk should he be released on bond. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) & (f). The district court’s conclusions are supported by the record. See United States v. Rueben, 974 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir.1992).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

1

. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 F. App'x 978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-vasquez-ca5-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack