United States v. Vasquez
This text of United States v. Vasquez (United States v. Vasquez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8414
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JORGE MAURICCIO VASQUEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:06-cr-00147-RJC-DCK-2)
Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: May 4, 2009
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jorge Mauriccio Vasquez, Appellant Pro Se. Keith Michael Cave, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jorge Mauriccio Vasquez appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to impose a new sentence. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
United States v. Vasquez, No. 3:06-cr-00147-RJC-DCK-2 (W.D.N.C.
Oct. 24, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Vasquez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-vasquez-ca4-2009.