United States v. Vargas-Luna

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 23, 2021
Docket21-40057
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Vargas-Luna (United States v. Vargas-Luna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Vargas-Luna, (5th Cir. 2021).

Opinion

Case: 21-40057 Document: 00515950777 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/23/2021

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED July 23, 2021 No. 21-40057 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Maria Vargas-Luna,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:19-CR-2111-2

Before Davis, Stewart, and Dennis, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Maria Vargas-Luna challenges her within-guidelines sentence of 108 months of imprisonment for conspiring to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine. As the sole issue on appeal, Vargas-Luna contends that the sentence

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 21-40057 Document: 00515950777 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/23/2021

No. 21-40057

violates her Sixth Amendment rights because its reasonableness depends upon facts found by the district court that were not admitted by her or proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. She concedes that her argument is foreclosed and moves for summary disposition. Vargas-Luna is correct that the issue is foreclosed. See United States v. Hernandez, 633 F.3d 370, 373-74 (5th Cir. 2011). Thus, summary disposition is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Hernandez
633 F.3d 370 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Vargas-Luna, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-vargas-luna-ca5-2021.