United States v. Vargas-Hidalgo
This text of 10 F. App'x 545 (United States v. Vargas-Hidalgo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Alvaro Vargas-Hidalgo appeals his 92-month sentence imposed by the district court following his conviction of being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Vargas-Hidalgo’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record. VargasHidalgo did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Having conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we conclude that there are no arguable appellate issues. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 F. App'x 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-vargas-hidalgo-ca9-2001.