United States v. Vargas-Duran
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Enrique VARGAS-DURAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-20116.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 26, 2003.
David Hill Peck, James Lee Turner, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Roland E. Dahlin, II, Fed. Pub. Def., Timothy William Crooks, Asst. Fed. Pub. Def., Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Vanessa D. Gilmore, Judge.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion Jan. 16, 2003, 5th Cir., 2003, 319 F.3d 194)
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
356 F.3d 598 (United States v. Vargas-Duran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.