United States v. Vandivere

623 F. App'x 101
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 24, 2015
DocketNo. 15-7427
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 623 F. App'x 101 (United States v. Vandivere) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Vandivere, 623 F. App'x 101 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Dow Vandivere seeks to appeal the district court’s denial of his pro se motion for summary judgment in the civil commitment proceedings against him. The Government has moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Vandivere seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we grant the Government’s motion and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vandivere v. Lynch
District of Columbia, 2017

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
623 F. App'x 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-vandivere-ca4-2015.