United States v. Vanderbilt

379 F. App'x 397
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 26, 2010·No. Nos. 09-11017, 09-11019·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Donald Ray Vanderbilt has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Vanderbilt has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Vanderbilt, 379 F. App'x 397 (5th Cir. 2010).

379 F. App'x 397 (United States v. Vanderbilt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)