United States v. Vance M.
This text of 48 F. App'x 601 (United States v. Vance M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Petitioner V.J.M. (“Vance”), a juvenile, appeals his sentence of probation until he turns twenty-one (approximately 77 months). We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court.
Vance argues that his probation term is governed by the five year maximum stated in 18 U.S.C. § 3561(c). We reject this argument because 18 U.S.C. § 3561(c) is not applicable in this case. The first section of 18 U.S.C. § 3561, § 3561(a), bars probation for all Class A felonies. It follows that the temporal limitation in § 3561(c) is only applicable when probation itself is authorized. Vance’s offense would have been a Class A felony if he had been tried and convicted as an adult. 18 U.S.C. § 2241(c). Therefore, the limitation in § 3561(c) does not control Vance’s probation term.
[602]*602The only applicable limitation on Vance’s probation term is the date when he becomes twenty-one, as stated in 18 U.S.C. § 3057(b)(1)(A). Vance’s probation term is consistent with this limitation.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 F. App'x 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-vance-m-ca9-2002.