United States v. Vance and Helen Mauney
This text of 245 F.2d 956 (United States v. Vance and Helen Mauney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
245 F.2d 956
UNITED STATES of America
v.
Vance and Helen MAUNEY.
No. 5583.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
March 20, 1957.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico.
Paul F. Larrazolo, U. S. Atty., and James A. Borland, Asst. U. S. Atty., Albuquerque, N. M., and Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Keleher & McLeod, Albuquerque, N. M., and Felix Atwood, Dallas, Tex., for appellee.
Before BRATTON, Chief Judge.
Appeal dismissed on motion of appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
245 F.2d 956, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-vance-and-helen-mauney-ca10-1957.