United States v. Van Lith
This text of 511 F. App'x 653 (United States v. Van Lith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Appellants Matthew Van Lith and Kai-ley Doan, who were convicted of marijuana possession at an Idaho campground, challenge the district court’s denial of their motions to suppress.
The district court properly denied the motions to suppress because, under the totality of circumstances, the Bureau of Land Management ranger “had a particularized and objective basis for suspecting” that Van Lith and Doan were engaged in [654]*654criminal activity. United States v. Basher, 629 F.3d 1161, 1165 (9th Cir.2011) (citation omitted).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
511 F. App'x 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-van-lith-ca9-2013.