United States v. Valenzuela

7 C.M.A. 45, 7 USCMA 45, 21 C.M.R. 171, 1956 CMA LEXIS 273, 1956 WL 4564
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided May 4, 1956·No. No. 6852·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

The issues raised in this case are the same as those in United States v Turner, 7 USCMA 38, 21 CMR 134, decided this date. For the reasons stated in our opinion in that case, the Petition for New Trial is denied. The decision of the board of review and the action of the convening authority are set aside.

The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General for reference to a general court-martial authority other than that which acted upon the initial review. In accordance with Article 61, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 648, a new review will be made by a Staff Judge Advocate who has had no previous connection with the case and a new action will be taken by such general court-martial authority.

Judge Latimer concurs. Judge Ferguson did not participate in the decision in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Valenzuela, 7 C.M.A. 45, 7 USCMA 45, 21 C.M.R. 171, 1956 CMA LEXIS 273, 1956 WL 4564 (cma 1956).

7 C.M.A. 45 (United States v. Valenzuela) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Bacon
12 M.J. 489 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1982)
United States v. Butler
13 C.M.A. 260 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1962)
United States v. McGary
9 C.M.A. 244 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)