United States v. Valentin

173 F. App'x 785
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 27, 2006·No. No. 05-13759; D.C. Docket No. 98-00562-CR-FAM·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Amador Valentin appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to recommend [786] to the bureau of prisons that he serve his federal sentence at a state facility, which he filed six years after his conviction became final. Miguel Caridad, appointed counsel for Valentin, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of Valentin’s motion is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Valentin, 173 F. App'x 785 (11th Cir. 2006).

173 F. App'x 785 (United States v. Valentin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)