United States v. Valencia

68 F. App'x 20
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 13, 2003·No. No. 02-30239; D.C. No. CR-01-00108-SEH·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

We conclude that sufficient evidence exists to support the jury’s determination [21] that Francisco Valencia committed the crime of sexual abuse of a minor by engaging in a sexual act with his minor cousin, Buffy Y. United States v. Carranza, 289 F.3d 634, 641 — 42 (9th Cir.2002).

Next, the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding certain evidence about the relationship between Buffy and her mother, or an alleged conversation between Buffy and her mother regarding a false sexual abuse allegation against Buffy’s father in an unrelated prior incident. United States v. Payne, 944 F.2d 1458, 1469 (9th Cir.1991). We conclude that Valencia’s Sixth Amendment right was not violated. Lilly v. Virginia, 527 U.S. 116, 136-37, 119 S.Ct. 1887, 144 L.Ed.2d 117 (1999).

The district court is AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Valencia, 68 F. App'x 20 (9th Cir. 2003).

68 F. App'x 20 (United States v. Valencia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lilly v. Virginia
527 U.S. 116 (Supreme Court, 1999)
United States v. David J. Payne
944 F.2d 1458 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)
United States v. Edward Carranza
289 F.3d 634 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)