United States v. Valencia
This text of 68 F. App'x 20 (United States v. Valencia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
We conclude that sufficient evidence exists to support the jury’s determination [21]*21that Francisco Valencia committed the crime of sexual abuse of a minor by engaging in a sexual act with his minor cousin, Buffy Y. United States v. Carranza, 289 F.3d 634, 641 — 42 (9th Cir.2002).
Next, the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding certain evidence about the relationship between Buffy and her mother, or an alleged conversation between Buffy and her mother regarding a false sexual abuse allegation against Buffy’s father in an unrelated prior incident. United States v. Payne, 944 F.2d 1458, 1469 (9th Cir.1991). We conclude that Valencia’s Sixth Amendment right was not violated. Lilly v. Virginia, 527 U.S. 116, 136-37, 119 S.Ct. 1887, 144 L.Ed.2d 117 (1999).
The district court is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 F. App'x 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-valencia-ca9-2003.