United States v. Valdez-Ramirez
Opinion
Lauro Alfonso Valdez-Ramirez appeals the 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being found in the United States after illegal re-entry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Valdez-Ramirez contends that the district court violated his constitutional rights [598]*598by imposing a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) based on a prior conviction that was neither proved to a jury nor admitted during the plea colloquy. Valdez-Ramirez concedes, and we agree, that this contention is foreclosed. See United States v. Beng-Salazar, 452 F.3d 1088, 1091 (9th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
210 F. App'x 597 (United States v. Valdez-Ramirez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.