United States v. Valdez

101 F. App'x 181
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 21, 2004
DocketNo. 03-3333
StatusPublished

This text of 101 F. App'x 181 (United States v. Valdez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Valdez, 101 F. App'x 181 (8th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Martin Gonzalez Valdez pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute over 500 grams of a mixture containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846. The district court1 sentenced him to 135 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 F. App'x 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-valdez-ca8-2004.