United States v. Valdez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Valdez. Read the opinion of the Court — 453 F.3d 252
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 18, 2007·No. 05-40507·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT F I L E D April 18, 2007 No. 05-40507 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

JESSE VALDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-492-1 --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Jesse Valdez has filed a

motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Valdez has filed a response. Our

independent review of the brief, Valdez’s response, and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,

the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Valdez’s motion to strike the

Anders brief is DENIED. Valdez’s motion to proceed pro se is

also DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03

(5th Cir. 1998).

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Valdez, (5th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Valdez (United States v. Valdez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Wagner
158 F.3d 901 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)