United States v. Valadez

58 F. App'x 668
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 7, 2003
DocketNo. 03-1291
StatusPublished

This text of 58 F. App'x 668 (United States v. Valadez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Valadez, 58 F. App'x 668 (8th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Antonio Joe Valadez pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine and possession of a firearm during a drug-trafficking offense. On appeal, Valadez’s counsel has filed a brief and requested permission to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Although we granted Valadez permission to file a supplemental brief, he has not done so.

After reviewing counsel’s Anders brief, along with our independent review of the record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm the district court,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 F. App'x 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-valadez-ca8-2003.