United States v. URSIN

CourtNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
DecidedAugust 12, 2025
Docket202500009
StatusPublished

This text of United States v. URSIN (United States v. URSIN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. URSIN, (N.M. 2025).

Opinion

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before DALY, GROSS, and ATTANASIO Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES Appellee

v.

Andreas K. URSIN Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

No. 202500009

Decided: 12 August 2025

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: David C. Segraves

Sentence adjudged 4 September 2024 by a special court-martial tried at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for one month, and a bad-conduct discharge. 1

For Appellant: Commander Candice C. Albright, JAGC, USN

1 Appellant was credited with having served 8 days of pretrial confinement. United States v. Ursin, NMCCA No. 202500009 Opinion of the Court

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 2 However, we note that the Entry of Judgment does not comply with Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 1111(b)(1)(B) in that it incorrectly lists Appellant’s plea to Specification 1 of Charge II. Although we find no prejudice, Appellant is entitled to have court-martial records that correctly reflect the content of his proceeding. 3 In accordance with R.C.M. 1111(c)(2), we modify the Entry of Judgment and direct that it be included in the record. The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court

2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.

3 United States v. Crumpley, 49 M.J. 538, 539 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 1998).

2 UNITED STATES NMCCA NO. 202500009

v. ENTRY OF Andreas K. URSIN JUDGMENT Lance Corporal (E-3) U.S. Marine Corps As Modified on Appeal Accused 12 August 2025

On 4 September 2024, the Accused was tried at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, California, by a special court-martial, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Military Judge David C. Segraves presided.

FINDINGS

The following are the Accused’s pleas and the Court’s findings to all of- fenses the convening authority referred to trial:

Charge I: Violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 892. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed.

Specification 1: Failure to Obey Regulation, to wit: Enclosure 5, Paragraph 1.c, SECNAVINST 5300.28F, between on or about 1 December 2023 and on or about 29 February 2024 by wrongfully possessing mushrooms with intent to induce intoxication: Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed.

Specification 2: Failure to Obey Regulation, to wit: Enclosure 5, Paragraph 1.c, SECNAVINST 5300.28F, between on or about 1 December 2023 and on or about 29 February 2024 by wrongfully using mushrooms with intent to induce intoxication: Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed. United States v. Ursin, NMCCA No. 202500009 Modified Entry of Judgment

Specification 3: Violation of No Contact Order issued by Lieutenant Colonel S.D. dated 21 February 2024, did, between on or about 21 February 2024 and on or about 7 May 2024, disobey the Order by wrongfully communicating with Private First Class T.F. and Lance Corporal M.C. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed.

Charge II: Violation of Article 81, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 881. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed.

Specification 1: Conspiracy to Violate Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 892, to wit: Enclosure 5, Paragraph 1.c, SECNAVINST 5300.28F, Wrongful Use of a Controlled Substance, mushrooms, between on or about 1 December 2023 and on or about 29 February 2024: Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed.

Specification 2: Conspiracy to Violate Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 892, to wit: Enclosure 5, Paragraph 1.c, SECNAVINST 5300.28F, Wrongful Distribution of a Controlled Substance, mushrooms, between on or about 1 December 2023 and on or about 29 February 2024: Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed.

Specification 3: Conspiracy to Violate Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a, Wrongful Possession of a Controlled Substance, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), between on or about 1 December 2023 and on or about 29 February 2024: Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed.

2 United States v. Ursin, NMCCA No. 202500009 Modified Entry of Judgment

Specification 4: Conspiracy to Violate Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a, Wrongful Distribution of a Controlled Substance, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), between on or about 1 December 2023 and on or about 29 February 2024: Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed.

Charge III: Violation of Article 82, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 882. Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed.

Specification 1: Between on or about 1 December 2023 and on or about 29 February 2024, wrongfully solicit Lance Corporal M.F. to use a controlled substance in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a: Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed.

Specification 2: Between on or about 1 December 2023 and on or about 29 February 2024, wrongfully solicit Lance Corporal Z.J. to use a controlled substance in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a: Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed.

Specification 3: Between on or about 1 December 2023 and on or about 29 February 2024, wrongfully solicit Lance Corporal M.C. to use a controlled substance in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a: Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed.

Specification 4: Between on or about 1 December 2023 and on or about 29 February 2024 wrongfully solicit Corporal N.D. to use a controlled substance in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a:

3 United States v. Ursin, NMCCA No. 202500009 Modified Entry of Judgment

Plea: Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed.

Charge IV: Violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Crumpley
49 M.J. 538 (Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. URSIN, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ursin-nmcca-2025.