United States v. Uriarte-Quintero
This text of 139 F. App'x 838 (United States v. Uriarte-Quintero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Israel Uriarte-Quintero appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1)(A) and possession with intent to distribute and distribution of a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1)(A), (b)(1)(A).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Uriarte-Quintero has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Uriarte-Quintero did not timely file a pro se supplemental brief. The government has not filed a responding brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 F. App'x 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-uriarte-quintero-ca9-2005.