United States v. Urdiera
This text of United States v. Urdiera (United States v. Urdiera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 17, 2004
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 03-40340 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CLETO ANTUNEZ URDIERA,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-02-CR-551-ALL
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Cleto Antunez Urdiera has moved
for leave to withdraw from this direct appeal and has filed a brief
as required by Anders v. California.1 Antunez Urdiera has received
a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response.
Our independent review of the brief and of the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 1 386 U.S. 738 (1967). to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.2
2 See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Urdiera, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-urdiera-ca5-2004.