United States v. Urbina-Hernandez

182 F. App'x 617
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 30, 2006
Docket05-3201
StatusUnpublished

This text of 182 F. App'x 617 (United States v. Urbina-Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Urbina-Hernandez, 182 F. App'x 617 (8th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rafael Urbina-Hernandez (Hernandez) pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the United States after having been deported following a felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). At sentencing the district court 1 refused to depart *618 downward from the applicable Guidelines range and imposed a sentence of 48 months in prison and 2 years of supervised release. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that Hernandez’s sentence is unreasonable.

Hernandez may not assign error based on the district court’s refusal to depart at sentencing, because the court’s ruling was discretionary and not the result of a mistaken belief that the court lacked authority to depart. See United States v. Morell, 429 F.3d 1161, 1164 (8th Cir.2005) (discretionary denial of downward departure is unreviewable). Also, Hernandez has not rebutted the presumption of reasonableness that attaches to a sentence imposed within the applicable Guidelines range. See United States v. Lincoln, 413 F.3d 716, 717-18 (8th Cir.) (sentence within Guidelines range is presumptively reasonable; defendant bears burden to rebut presumption of reasonableness), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 840, 163 L.Ed.2d 715 (2005).

Having carefully reviewed the record, we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Richard Lincoln
413 F.3d 716 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Jimmy Dwayne Morell
429 F.3d 1161 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 F. App'x 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-urbina-hernandez-ca8-2006.