United States v. UNKNOWN HEIRS, ETC.

152 F. Supp. 452, 1957 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3416
CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma
DecidedJuly 12, 1957
DocketCiv. A. 7553
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 152 F. Supp. 452 (United States v. UNKNOWN HEIRS, ETC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. UNKNOWN HEIRS, ETC., 152 F. Supp. 452, 1957 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3416 (W.D. Okla. 1957).

Opinion

RIZLEY, District Judge.

The Department of the Army finding it necessary to expand Fort Sill Military Reservation for use in connection with the Fort Sill artillery and guided missile center project, purchased a tract of land identified and designated as Tract No. D-447. Within said tract there is a cemetery known as Post Oak Mission Cemetery. The cemetery contains some seven hundred graves including the graves of the celebrated and distinguished last chief of the Comanche Indians, Quanah Parker, and his illustrious mother, Cynthia Ann Parker.

In order for the Department of the Army to complete its program of expansion and fully utilize the tract of land heretofore mentioned and described it is necessary that the bodies interred therein be removed and reinterred at some suitable location. A new location for reburial purposes was acquired by the Government in the Northeast Quarter of Section 27, Township 2, North Range 15 W.I.M. in Comanche County, Oklahoma and said tract has been made available to the heirs and next of kin of those buried in the Post Oak Mission Cemetery.

The above-styled cause was instituted by the Government to give appropriate and legal sanction to its proceeding for removal and reinterment of those persons found to be interred in Post Oak Mission Cemetery.

There is no objection on the part of the Government for reinterment in other locations than the one obtained by it if the next of kin so desire.

Timely, and pursuant to proper notice in this case one To-Pay by and through her counsel entered a general appearance in said cause and asserted and alleged that she is the surviving spouse of Quanah Parker and as such under Oklahoma law has the right to designate the place of his interment. Likewise, Neda Parker Birdsong, Wanda Page, Alice Purdy, Len Parker, Baldwin Parker and Tom Parker through their counsel entered their appearance and filed their response claiming among other things that they are six of the surviving children of Quanah Parker and grandchildren of Cynthia Ann Parker. They denied that To-Pay is the surviving spouse of their father Quanah Parker. They say that prior to Oklahoma statehood their father Quanah Parker as Chief of the Comanche Tribe pursuant to existing Indian laws and customs had married several women including their mothers. They further say that in 1907 their father as Chief of the Comanches and after visiting the Congress of the United States and also after having a visit with President Theodore Roosevelt at which time he was advised it was illegal under the laws of the United States and the State of Oklahoma to have plural wives, decided to bow to the will of the law makers and that he fully adopted the ways of the white man and selected among his then Indian wives an Indian woman known as To-nar-cy as his legal wife, lived with her as such to the exclusion of all others for the remainder of his life and died in her arms in 1911.

The surviving children further say that even admitting for argument’s sake that their father Quanah Parker was married to To-Pay (which they deny), that by reason of To-Pay’s remarrying after their father’s death to one Jud Komah that under Indian law and custom she no longer remained the widow of *454 their deceased father and loses all the rights she might have had under Indian law to claim to be the widow of such deceased Indian.

Neither To-Pay, who claims to be the surviving spouse of Quanah Parker, or his surviving children desire to have him reinterred in the tract acquired by the Government for that purpose. To-Pay wants him reinterred in a cemetery at Cache, Oklahoma. The children want him reinterred in the Government Cemetery at Fort Sill, Oklahoma. Either of said locations are agreeable to the Government and it takes no part in the squabble between To-Pay and the alleged children of said Quanah Parker in respect to the place of interment.

On the 9th day of July, 1957, the matter came on to be heard before this Court on the issues joined by the respective responses of To-Pay on the one hand and those persons designated herein as the children of Quanah Parker and the grandchildren of Cynthia Ann Parker, deceased.

To-Pay appeared in person and by her counsel Vernon C. Field, Esquire. The Parker children appeared some in person and by their counsel Arthur L. Cavanagh, Esquire. The Government, the plaintiff in said cause, was represented by H. Dale Cook, Assistant United States District Attorney for the Western District of Oklahoma, who appeared in the capacity of an observer and took no part in the controversy between the respective respondents.

A record was made consisting of various and sundry admissions of the parties, written exhibits and for the purpose of expediting the cause, the Court permitted counsel for the respective respondents to state into the record the names of the various and sundry witnesses and what their testimony would be if they were sworn and examined in Court, including the agreement between counsel that such witnesses as might be produced by the respective respondents, giving their names, would testify to the facts narrated by counsel for the record.

We think a fair summary of the testimony of the respondent To-Pay would be that she was the wife of Quanah Parker- — one of a multiple of wives— that she lived with him for many years, first in a tent or tepee and subsequently in what she referred to as the big house. That she had a number of children by him all of whom are now deceased. That she is about 87 years of age. That she received one-third of his estate. That Quanah Parker prior to his death stated that he desired to be buried alongside his mother, Cynthia Ann Parker, and that he be buried with his Comanche people for all of which reasons she desires to have him reinterred at Cache, Oklahoma.

The respondent To-Pay likewise offered in evidence a letter from the United States Department of the Interior stating that To-Pay was recognized as one of the plural wives of Quanah Parker and that at the time of his death the Government recognized To-Pay and Tonar-cy as his two surviving wives and that both were entitled to share in his estate.

The respondent To-Pay also introduced in evidence what purports to be a letter from Werahre Parker Tahmahkera who claims to be the oldest living daughter of Quanah Parker. She joins with the respondent To-Pay in requesting that he be buried at Cache, Oklahoma. She claims her father recognized To-Pay as his wife and that at some time he discarded To-nar-cy claiming that she had been unfaithful to him.

The testimony of the respondents designated as children of Quanah Parker may be properly summarized, we believe, by saying as surviving children of Qua-nah Parker that they have the right to designate the place of reinterment. They say he was not married to To-Pay at the time of his death. They admit that he lived with To-Pay and numerous other wives and that when he died both To-Pay and To-nar-cy were living.

They claim their father at statehood time or thereabouts after being told *455 that it was illegal to have plural marriages, discarded all of his wives except To-nar-cy and that she was his legal or chief wife at the time of his death and that since she is now deceased they have the right of designation. They offered numerous supporting witnesses whose testimony was narrated in the record by their counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bellevue Masonic Temple, Inc. v. Lokken
452 P.2d 544 (Washington Supreme Court, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 F. Supp. 452, 1957 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-unknown-heirs-etc-okwd-1957.