United States v. University of Washington

Fourth Circuit

United States v. University of Washington

89 F. App'x 410

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 15, 2004·No. No. 03-2180·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Thomas V. Prevenslik appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action filed pursuant to the False Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States of America, Ex Rel Prevenslik v. University of Wash., No. CA-02-1-80-MJG (D. Md. filed June 20, 2003; entered June 23, 2003). We deny the motions for oral argument and for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Thomas V. Prevenslik appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action filed pursuant to the False Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States of America, Ex Rel Prevenslik v. University of Wash., No. CA-02-1-80-MJG (D. Md. filed June 20, 2003; entered June 23, 2003). We deny the motions for oral argument and for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. University of Washington, 89 F. App'x 410 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

89 F. App'x 410 (United States v. University of Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.