United States v. Universal Rehabilitation Services (PA), Inc.

173 F.3d 914, 1999 WL 329277
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedMay 4, 1999
DocketNos. 97-1412, 97-1414, 97-1468
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 173 F.3d 914 (United States v. Universal Rehabilitation Services (PA), Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Universal Rehabilitation Services (PA), Inc., 173 F.3d 914, 1999 WL 329277 (3d Cir. 1999).

Opinion

ORDER

BECKER, Chief Judge.

It is hereby ORDERED that

1. The motion to vacate the Order granting rehearing en banc is denied;

2. The motion for leave to file a response to Government’s Petition for Rehearing is denied; and

3. The case number 97-1468 is hereby removed from the Order dated April 15, 1999 granting Rehearing En Banc.

[915]*915The parties shall file supplemental mem-oranda in which they set forth what factors should be considered by the District Court in ruling on the admissibility of a testifying co-conspirator’s guilty plea; what Third Circuit cases set forth these factors as a consideration; and how these factors apply to the facts of the case before us. Appellant shall file a memorandum within 3 weeks and the ■ Government shall have 2 weeks to reply.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 F.3d 914, 1999 WL 329277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-universal-rehabilitation-services-pa-inc-ca3-1999.