United States v. United Technologies Corporation

946 F. Supp. 2d 135, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92494
CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedMay 29, 2013
DocketCivil Action No. 2012-1230
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 946 F. Supp. 2d 135 (United States v. United Technologies Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. United Technologies Corporation, 946 F. Supp. 2d 135, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92494 (D.D.C. 2013).

Opinion

FINAL JUDGMENT

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, District Judge.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, United States of America, filed its Complaint on July 26, 2012, the United States and Defendants United Technologies Corporation (“UTC”) and Goodrich Corporation (“Goodrich”), by their respective attorneys, have consented to the entry of this Final Judgment without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and without this Final Judgment constituting any evidence against or admission by any party regarding any issue of fact or law;

AND WHEREAS, Defendants agree to be bound by the provisions of this Final Judgment pending its approval by the Court;

AND WHEREAS, the essence of this Final Judgment is the prompt and certain divestiture of certain rights and assets by Defendants to assure that competition is not substantially lessened;

AND WHEREAS, the United States requires Defendants to make certain divestitures and make certain commitments for the purpose of remedying the loss of competition alleged in the Complaint;

AND WHEREAS, Defendants have represented to the United States that the divestitures required below can and will be made and that Defendants will later raise no claim of hardship or difficulty as grounds for asking the Court to modify any of the divestiture provisions contained below;

NOW THEREFORE, before any testimony is taken, without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and upon consent of the parties, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:

I. JURISDICTION

This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of and each of the parties to this action. The Complaint states a claim upon which relief may be granted against Defendants under Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended (15 U.S.C. § 18).

II. DEFINITIONS

As used in this Final Judgment:

A. “Acquirer” or “Acquirers” means the entity or entities to which Defendants divest the Divestiture Assets.

B. “Acquirer of the Electrical Power Divestiture Assets” means the entity to which Defendants divest the Electrical Power Divestiture Assets.

C. “Acquirer of the Engine Control Divestiture Assets” means the entity to which Defendants divest the Engine Control Divestiture Assets.

D. “Acquirer of the AEC Shares” means Rolls-Royce or another entity to which Defendants divest the AEC Shares.

E. “Acquirer of the Aerolec Shares” means Thales or another entity to which Defendants divest the Aerolec Shares.

F. “UTC” means Defendant United Technologies Corporation, a Delaware corporation with its headquarters in Hartford, Connecticut, its successors, assigns, subsidiaries, divisions, groups, affiliates, and partnerships, and their directors, officers, managers, agents, and employees.

G. “Goodrich” means Defendant Goodrich Corporation, a New York corporation with its headquarters in Charlotte, North Carolina, its successors, assigns, subsidiaries, divisions, groups, affiliates, and partnerships, and their directors, officers, managers, agents, and employees.

*137 H. “Rolls-Royce” means Rolls-Royce Group pic, a company incorporated in England and Wales with a registered office in London, its successors, assigns, subsidiaries, divisions, groups, affiliates, and partnerships, and their directors, officers, managers, agents, and employees.

I. “Thales” means Thales Avionics Electrical Systems SA, a company incorporated in France with a registered office in Neuilly-Sur-Seine, France, its successors, assigns, subsidiaries, divisions, groups, affiliates, and partnerships, and their directors, officers, managers, agents, and employees.

J. “West Hartford Facility” means Goodrich’s facility located at Charter Oak Boulevard, West Hartford, Connecticut 06133.

K. “Montreal Facility” means Goodrich’s facility located at 5595 Royalmount Avenue, Montreal H4P 1J9 QU, Canada, which will be transitioned to the West Hartford Facility.

L. “Engine Control Products” means all Goodrich products and services that are designed, developed, manufactured, marketed, serviced, distributed, repaired, and/or sold out of or using the assets located in the West Hartford Facility and/or the Montreal Facility on the date the Complaint is filed in this matter, including but not limited to electronic engine controls, fuel metering units, main fuel pumps, and ancillary engine control products (including but not limited to, engine actuators, ejector pumps and tanks, hot oil valves, shut-off valves, flow dividers, start flow control valves, lube pumps, and lube and scavenge pumps). Engine Control Products exclude maintenance, repair, and overhaul services currently performed at the Montreal Facility for the following: (1) products designed specifically to be used on the Rolls-Royce Tay and Spey engines; (2)products designed specifically to be used on the General Electric F404 engine; (3)products designed specifically to be used on the Pratt & Whitney PW305 engine; and (4) the servo actuator and yaw damper product lines.

M.“Engine Control Divestiture Assets” means:

(1) The West Hartford Facility and all tangible and intangible assets used by or located in the West Hartford Facility;
(2) All tangible and intangible assets used by or located in the Montreal Facility that are used to design, develop, manufacture, market, service, distribute, repair, and/or sell Engine Control Products;
(3) All tangible assets, wherever located, that are used to design, develop, and/or manufacture Engine Control Products, including, but not limited to, assets relating to research and development activities, manufacturing equipment, tooling, fixed assets, personal property, inventory, office furniture, materials, supplies, licenses, permits, authorizations issued by any governmental organization, contracts, teaming arrangements, agreements, leases, commitments, certifications, supply agreements, understandings, customer lists, contracts, accounts, credit records, information technology systems, and repair, performance, and other records; and
(4) All intangible assets, wherever located, that are used to design, develop, and/or manufacture Engine Control Products, including, but not limited to, contractual rights, patents, licenses, sublicenses, intellectual property, copyrights, trademarks, trade names, service marks, service names, technical information, computer software and related documentation, know-how, trade secrets, drawings, blueprints, designs, design *138 protocols, specifications for materials, specifications for parts and devices, safety procedures, quality assurance and control procedures, design tools, simulation capability, manuals and technical information provided to Goodrich employees, customers, suppliers, agents, or licensees, and research data concerning historic and current research and development efforts, including, but not limited to, designs of experiments and results of successful and unsuccessful designs and experiments;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bartolucci v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc.
245 F. Supp. 3d 38 (District of Columbia, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
946 F. Supp. 2d 135, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-united-technologies-corporation-dcd-2013.