United States v. United States Steel Corp.
This text of 525 F.2d 1214 (United States v. United States Steel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitions for Rehearing are denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12), the Petition of United States Steel Corporation for Rehearing En Banc is denied.
By way of clarification, all parties should recognize that the district court’s final certification of the “new” Ford class is the door that bars opting out by class members. The panel’s original opinion in this cause was not intended to rule out the tender of back pay under the Consent Decree approved by this Court in United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Industries, Inc., 5th Cir. 1975, 517 F.2d 826. The district court will, on remand, define the “new” Ford class in such a way as to exclude those persons who elect to accept such back pay tenders. Cf. LaChapelle v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 5th Cir. 1975, 513 F.2d 286, 288 n. 7.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
525 F.2d 1214, 15 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 581, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 13362, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 10,616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-united-states-steel-corp-ca5-1976.