United States v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
This text of 477 F.2d 567 (United States v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
73-2 USTC P 9554
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 71-2245.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
June 1, 1973.
Richard A. Scully, Washington, D. C. (argued), Dean C. Smith, U. S. Atty., Carroll D. Gray, Asst. U. S. Atty., Spokane, Wash., Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks, Crombie J. D. Garrett, John J. McCarthy, John M. Dowd, Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellant.
Richard C. Fields (argued), of Moffatt, Thomas, Barrett & Blanton, Boise, Idaho, Eugene I. Annis, of Myers, Reiley & Annis, Spokane, Wash., for defendant-appellee.
Before KILKENNY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and BELLONI,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the district court, denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granting defendant's motion for summary judgment is affirmed for the reasons given therein, as reported in 328 F.Supp. 69 (E.D.Wash.1971).
Affirmed.
Honorable Robert C. Belloni, United States District Judge, District of Oregon, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
477 F.2d 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-united-states-fidelity-and-guaranty-company-ca9-1973.